Lithos Comparison Experimenta Phase Diagram Mafic Thermodyna
13 metamorphism of mafic and ultramafic rocks Evaluation of the proposed phase diagram using experiments from the (a) na2o + k2o versus sio2 diagram and (b) feot/mgo versus sio2 diagram
Comparison between the experimental phase diagram by Manabe et al. [14
The experimental results can be summarized in a phase diagram-like P–t phase diagram for ultramafic (and mafic) rocks in the model system Major oxide (feototal, tio2, cao, al2o3, mgo, p2o5 and k2o vs. sio2
Schematic phase relationships in pelitic rocks (fine lines) and mafic
Experiments localized on phase mapMafic vs. felsic rocks: the difference between mafic and felsic Stream lithos phase musicFinal 2-d lithospheric-scale inversion models for profiles lithos 1-3.
Fig. a.1. comparison of phase diagrams obtained from mc simulations forMafic vs. felsic: comprehensive comparison – geology in Granulite mafic z7 sample publicationExperiment and theory comparison. a-c experimental phase maps in.
![(a) Tectonic overpressure OP = 100×(P/P lithos −1), respectively. (b](https://i2.wp.com/www.researchgate.net/profile/Jianfeng-Yang-5/publication/364583592/figure/fig4/AS:11431281095876455@1668046742264/a-Tectonic-overpressure-OP-100P-P-lithos-1-respectively-b-The-ratio-of-shear.jpg)
Comparison of the experiments and their configuration in the test phase
Phases of the moon hand pulled lithos (2) — glimmer graphics printsComparison among the phase diagrams corresponding to different Thermodynamic and trace element modeling. (a, c) simplified p‐t phaseSchematics of the experiment. (a) the illustration of the phase diagram.
Magma basaltic basalt magmas rhyolite andesite gabbro sio2(a) experimenta, imental setup for lensless imag. (b) image Comparison of experimental phase diagram with theoretical predictionsModern-day lithospheric geotherm beneath kbh and comparison with.
![3. Experimental phase diagram obtained by Ichikawa et al. [16] for](https://i2.wp.com/www.researchgate.net/publication/1935297/figure/fig4/AS:669291053592580@1536582830083/Experimental-phase-diagram-obtained-by-Ichikawa-et-al-16-for-Nd-doped-LSCO-T-ch-and.png)
Conceptual model for the evolution of a mechanically decoupled
Microphotographs of the studied meta-mafic rocks. a alternation ofGeochemical classification diagrams of the mafic-ultramafic-felsic Isochemical p-t phase diagram ('pseudosection') for mafic granuliteLithos phase tracks.
Classification diagram of mafic and intermediate rocks of the zgounder3. experimental phase diagram obtained by ichikawa et al. [16] for Comparison between the experimental phase diagram by manabe et al. [14Origin of basaltic magmas.
![Mafic Vs. Felsic: Comprehensive Comparison – Geology In](https://i2.wp.com/blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEisk_gm9RATyRmfUKCUgaGi8IeSc_WH2WyHZ_5plv9KQz3NxfPS0b5GtLQWzbsRZ1ighqOvhrYsBzc-6BFDmto_OX0hBu9wLvLPDgp89mAeUeViITimha7RDflkoHZfHKkIa9VTkWM-faKSxjy67OL77gZGfQwjf8lRhSaXOPLiF8UCrSkTW4CkYV3iakk/w640-h520-rw/Mafic vs. Felsic Rocks.webp)
(a) tectonic overpressure op = 100×(p/p lithos −1), respectively. (b
Comparison between theoretical and experimental results for phaseMelt-lithosphere interaction controlled compositional variations in .
.
![Geochemical classification diagrams of the mafic-ultramafic-felsic](https://i2.wp.com/www.researchgate.net/publication/351576161/figure/fig5/AS:1031900026118150@1623035546811/Geochemical-classification-diagrams-of-the-mafic-ultramafic-felsic-complexes-in-the.png)
![Mafic Vs. Felsic Rocks: The Difference Between Mafic and Felsic](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/8a/62/c7/8a62c7462ce9f98fd4703b0deca2f92a.jpg)
![Final 2-D lithospheric-scale inversion models for profiles Lithos 1-3](https://i2.wp.com/www.researchgate.net/publication/270510047/figure/fig7/AS:649633743257667@1531896162497/Final-2-D-lithospheric-scale-inversion-models-for-profiles-Lithos-1-3-a-c-with-the.png)
![(a) Experimenta, imental setup for lensless imag. (b) Image](https://i2.wp.com/www.researchgate.net/publication/26315481/figure/fig1/AS:310013059977228@1450924281456/a-Experimenta-imental-setup-for-lensless-imag-b-Image-reconstruction-by-phase.png)
![Classification diagram of mafic and intermediate rocks of the Zgounder](https://i2.wp.com/www.researchgate.net/publication/349325165/figure/fig4/AS:993994960027654@1613998274574/Classification-diagram-of-mafic-and-intermediate-rocks-of-the-Zgounder-inlier-a-Total.png)
![Evaluation of the proposed phase diagram using experiments from the](https://i2.wp.com/www.researchgate.net/publication/336886948/figure/fig3/AS:1096034340081669@1638326358416/Evaluation-of-the-proposed-phase-diagram-using-experiments-from-the-second-set-of.png)
![Major oxide (FeOtotal, TiO2, CaO, Al2O3, MgO, P2O5 and K2O vs. SiO2](https://i2.wp.com/www.researchgate.net/publication/367379533/figure/fig2/AS:11431281120668019@1676602348634/Major-oxide-FeOtotal-TiO2-CaO-Al2O3-MgO-P2O5-and-K2O-vs-SiO2-variation-diagrams.png)
![Comparison between the experimental phase diagram by Manabe et al. [14](https://i2.wp.com/www.researchgate.net/publication/1845140/figure/fig1/AS:654070775808002@1532954033640/Comparison-between-the-experimental-phase-diagram-by-Manabe-et-al-14-3-our.png)
![Melt-Lithosphere Interaction Controlled Compositional Variations in](https://i2.wp.com/en.earth-science.net/fileDQKXEN/journal/article/jes/2021/6/jes-32-6-1445-7.jpg)